Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Ops, flipped it. If the price moves up you sell, if the price moves down you buy.

But then you aren't maintaining the invariant that you hold a number of shares equal to the current price.

> So, you will make money on a bounded random walk

Yes. If you know ahead of time what the price is going to do (even probabilistically) then you can make money. If you don't, you can't.




aren't maintaining the invariant Yes, it’s just the starting point for a really simple example.

If you know ahead of time what the price is going to do (even probabilistically) then you can make money. Exactly, you pick a model and make money ‘if’ reality fits that model. However, fast dumb models can make lots of money and complexity adds risks.

Anyway, many people get stuck with the idea you need the smartest people in the room while ignoring how much it costs to have the ‘smartest people’ in the room. Arguably, many companies are simply doing this to attract investors not because it maximizes returns as managing money is a great way to make money.


> fast dumb models can make lots of money

Sure, and they can also lose a lot of money.

> complexity adds risks

Not necessarily. Modern portfolio theory is a lot more complex than (say) buying and holding a single stock. But it's a lot less risky.

> you need the smartest people in the room

Maybe you don't need the smartest people in the room, but it helps not to have too many stupid ones. The real problem is that it can be really hard to tell which is which.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: