You really want to begrudge somebody getting a little bit of recognition now and again from the community for something they've worked on for such a long time?
And you'd like to go say what they've made is worthless?
I'm really saddened to see such a lack of empathy. In life we procreate and create, offspring and projects the only chance our fleeting sparks have to last into the long night of eternity. We should always be charitable to others who've made something, that we may one day be judged by the same measure.
Empathy aside: how many operating systems (kernel + userland) have you written, chummer?
The amount of time and effort you've put into something has no bearing on its quality, and thus whether it deserves recognition or not. It's absurd to think it does.
> And you'd like to go say what they've made is worthless?
It's patently obvious that it's worthless. What possible use does it serve? Morbid curiosity is the best you can say for it.
> We should always be charitable to others who've made something, that we may one day be judged by the same measure.
I judge my own work by an even less charitable measure than I'm using on TempleOS.
> Empathy aside: how many operating systems (kernel + userland) have you written, chummer?
This is the most ridiculous/tired response on the face of the earth to all criticism. "How many movies have you made?" "How many hit songs have you written?"
The fact that you even think that's a valid response says more about you than me.
> It's patently obvious that it's worthless. What possible use does it serve? Morbid curiosity is the best you can say for it.
Just curious, how much time have you spent using it? How much of the source have you read? How carefully did you read this article? Because if your answers to those questions are what I think they are, then you're just a dick.
So, none then? I've written zero operating systems, and like two userland tools (mostly special-purpose file archiving and packing stuff because I didn't know about tar). Then again, I still have respect for people that have bashed together crappy toy OSs.
Most people are worthless (just look at the distribution of wealth on this planet), most art is worthless, etc. etc. If we judged all our actions based on some silly notion of how ultimately worthless they were, we never would've gotten out of the trees because why bother.
As my mom used to say, a doodle has a right to be a doodle. Lighten up.
What possible use does it serve? Morbid curiosity is the best you can say for it.
That critique applies to lots of humans, especially those in the third-world working purely at a subsistence level in their own communities and with only insubstantial capital in their ownership. Their dreams will never amount to anything, and the vast majority will never know they even existed.
That, incidentally, is why I think that critique is repugnant--whether applied to a person or their work.
The fact that you haven't (presumably, though you might just be too shy to admit actual experience) implemented an operating system gives me reason to think you don't actually know what constitutes "terrible". Unless you can list facts and deficiencies of the system compared with others, you're just being parroting an opinion.
Great timing you've got there with deciding to step in. How about actually paying attention to the spamming and gaming of the system instead of jumping on me for getting annoyed with someone making me repeatedly explain myself?
I even removed part of what you quoted before you responded, and the part I didn't remove is obviously half joking.
Sorry I missed your edit—and thanks for editing to make your comment more civil—but what remains is still not ok, and there have been other examples recently. Language like that adds noise rather than signal, and causes harm even if the intention wasn't to.
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. E.g. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
>> Empathy aside: how many operating systems (kernel + userland) have you written, chummer?
> This is the most ridiculous/tired response on the face of the earth to all criticism. "How many movies have you made?" "How many hit songs have you written?"
Can you explain why it's ridiculous? It seems reasonable to me. Because I haven't created an OS (or movie or hit song), I don't know that I could do any better than anyone I'd want to criticize, so I'm probably better off not criticizing.
And you'd like to go say what they've made is worthless?
I'm really saddened to see such a lack of empathy. In life we procreate and create, offspring and projects the only chance our fleeting sparks have to last into the long night of eternity. We should always be charitable to others who've made something, that we may one day be judged by the same measure.
Empathy aside: how many operating systems (kernel + userland) have you written, chummer?