Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That said, the "One Lesson" of the book's title is applicable to all schools of economics: that to qualify as good economic thinking, the consequences of a proposed change must be propagated through the entire economy, and not cut off until they are plausibly insignificant. This is something that any modern economist should agree with, regardless of what their other biases are.



Wouldn't that make all microeconomics bad economic thinking?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: