Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Unfortunately, though flexbox is nice and a welcome addition, it's not the panacea people make it out to be having used it a fair bit in the past - the details of how it plays with the rest of the layout and the various options are complicated (see http://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/ if you don't believe me), and sometimes the interactions are confusing.

I still think there's scope for a language that compiles to CSS but allows totally intuitive positioning, provides error messages if you make a mistake and generally isn't as infuriating as CSS is. The amount of times I've done something which seemed like it really ought to do what I want and the layout doesn't change is unbelievable. Even assuming vertical alignment is totally solved by flexbox it's still an agonisingly painful thing to work with.




Maybe this can clear some things up: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/


I've been doing flexbox heavily for nearly the past year, and that post is my go-to reference, because I still can't remember all the properties and values. Highly recommended.





Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: