Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing? (cabmaddux.com)
192 points by cabmaddux on Feb 13, 2015 | hide | past | web | favorite | 68 comments



EDIT: To the author, the download and email icons are the same.

This is fantastic. A feature you might not have realized is that it works well with NoScript users. With font-faces considered harmful[0], these icons can be delivered to the user, vulnerability free.

[0] https://hackademix.net/2010/03/24/why-noscript-blocks-web-fo...


Thanks very much! I had no idea at all, I'll definitely look into it. Great to hear there's another positive for the project.

I'll take a look back at the email and download icons, good eye.


So, the million dollar question: is it faster to use these, images/sprites, icon fonts? The trade-off I'm assuming is download/load speed vs. cpu load?


Don't forget about compatibility. You can be reasonably sure that font icons will display the same everywhere. CSS-based icons are all over the map compatibility-wise (display issues across browsers).


Sure, but font icons can only be one color. Can you give an example of a compatibility issue?


Font Awesome allows stacking: http://blog.fontawesome.io/2014/09/25/custom-file-types-with...

Here's their demo but with some color added: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/VYQMea

But yeah, you're typically stuck with one color. Here's a demo that shows off multi-color fonts (Firefox only): http://pixelambacht.nl/2014/compyx-a-multicolor-8bit-font/

That technique could be used to make multi-color font icons if it were cross-browser compatible. Maybe one day. But I think SVG icons are where things are headed.

As for compatibility issues, there's one listed on this page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9047846


These icons get warped in Chrome when you set the zoom level to 125%. For example: the roof on the house in the lb-home icon is no longer centered.


Looks great but the first thing we see when we load the page is a couple lines of instruction and an icon which is not obvious/ just looks like a square and it's confusing.

If you want more people to use it, take the section that has the picture of ALL the icons, and move it to the top of the landing page. Just put some text like "LittleBox something about these icons people will like" in big letters.

I almost left the page. I am glad I scrolled down because I really like them, and I can use the flags in one of my projects.


If you liked building it, then it's worth continuing.

The icons look great.


True, a great point. It's not a bad creative outlet.

Thanks for taking a look!


First off, I think this is an awesome portfolio project.

As far as being worth continuing, I would say it's worth maintaining but not adding to (beyond compatibility) moving forward. It's a great example of what you're capable of, and maybe some might even use it seriously, but I know I'd start worrying about every little "wish they had/did this" comment that came my way. That leads to burnout.


It looks really great, changing color via CSS is neat!

maybe you could put the license information on that page! (The github page says it is MIT License for those who wonder)

btw the french flag is backwards (Blue - White - Red is the good one)

EDIT: Thanks for the flag fix benjamin!


I like it :)

Something that could further ease the color customization would be to use currentColor [1] on the border colors, allowing the customization to be made simply by changing the "color" attribute of the element.

[1] http://tympanus.net/codrops/css_reference/color_value/#secti... which I discovered with https://twitter.com/SaraSoueidan/status/564090319117881344


For sure, thanks for taking a look! And good eye on the French flag! I'll get that fixed up.

I'll make sure to add license info to that demo/download page. Thanks again, a huge help!


Aditionally, with the flags, I noticed that you have Switzerland as a rectangle. I know that's not an uncommon representation of it, but its flag is actually a square.

Just an fyi :)


And in the "pedantic++" category: check out flag proportions, too. See for example https://flagspot.net/flags/nl-lu.html, which explains the difference between the flags of Monaco and Indonesia (buried in a discussion about the flags of the Netherlands and Luxembourg): same colors, but different proportions.

So, Belgium should be 13:15 (https://flagspot.net/flags/be.html, for US flags 10:19 seems best for all uses (https://flagspot.net/flags/us-size.html#prop), etc.

But that certainly is just a fyi :)


I'd stay away from css to create images personally. it's just too hackish. seems like wikipedia implements some sort of svg to png conversion on the fly. that is preferable for me. css isn't even good at what it's intended for. I certainly don't see it solving more problems.


I wonder if SVG is more suited to something like this...


I was completely amazed when I recently checked browser support for inline SVG; almost all current browsers support them! [1] So I decided to use inline SVG for icons and logos. It's extremely fast (no separate network request, images embedded in gzipped html source), and as a bonus I can style the images easily using CSS (eg. change colors on hover/active state)

Example see here: http://jsfiddle.net/Lszz5392/1/

The nicest part about this is that I can use Adobe Illustrator (or any other vector editor) to create the graphics, and then paste them straight into HTML.

[1]: http://caniuse.com/#feat=svg-html5


It might sound weird but I actually like to draw simple SVG images using text editor. SVG is well suited for that, it's readable and compact.


Yes, I've done that too. What's even nicer is that you can write scripts that generate SVG. Drawing symmetric things like a gear can be very cumbersome in a vector editor, but it's really nice if you draw it with a script. (And I was finally able to make use of all the math & geometry I learned in school)


it's exactly what svg is suited for. I cringe anytime I see css graphics. ONe guy did an entire 3D scene using CSS and I was both awestruck and sickened when I saw the explanation of how it was done. what a pain in the ass with little reward IMO. But if somebody wants to do something, whatevs go for it. hack away.


Tested your page on an i3, all 4 cores are at 60%+ that's not very good... probably affects only the animated ones still


That doesn't sound right. My 2520M stays at about 8%, using Firefox. That's still relatively high, but in reality there would only be a few on the screen at once.


I can confirm that an i5-4200U (decent < 1000$ notebook) goes from 2-4% lowest proc frequency to 14% max proc frequency (and the fan starts). Using Firefox. It is clearly noticeable. Of course YMMV


Important thing to note (and most devs forget this):

One does not simply browse only one page at a time anymore


Similar here, current chrome on Windows 7 pulls CPU load from ~8 to 40 % and spins up the fan noticeably.


update: Linux, Chrome

Maybe the animated ones should be left as images so far, otherwise great work with the static icons ++


Nice.. with gz transmission, looks like it's under 9kb, which isn't bad at all for an icon set.


Certainly continue! I think there's a lot more you could do, and I really like them so far.


Thanks! I agree might be interesting to try to capitalize further on animating/coloring individual elements and work on scalability. Just trying to gauge how much time to invest.

The feedback is a huge help!


The flag icons are super nice.

As for the "littlebox icon set", from my standpoint (mostly designer) no. In an icon set I am looking for a) feel and b) perfect balance between each icon so everything feels connected.

That in itself is super hard to get right, even when not limiting yourself to CSS to do it. While this is an impressive feat it doesn't get there for me on either front, compared to what's available out there. So unless there was a very specific reason not to resort to an actual font and/or graphics, I wouldn't consider this one.


Brazil's flag looks really weird. I would say it's unusable...


It seems really well done. However I can't help but think "is this really a use case for CSS; or more of a neat hack?". Is that why you're asking if it's worth continuing?


True, may just be a neat hack. The opportunity to work with individual elements of an icon independently and the challenge of the constraints was the initial draw to the project. Maybe there would be a use case for the simple icons and icons that would really benefit from coloring individual elements (hence the flags), but I think there are definitely plenty of drawbacks and it's pretty hacky in some places.

I also don't have a great understanding of some of the technical drawbacks and compatibility issues that have been brought up here, so this HN conversation has been an enormous help.

I think you've hit on my main question. Thanks for the feedback and for taking a look!


Oh yes absolutely. Theses are fantastic icons, really well done man.


Thanks very much, feels good to hear they hold up!


Nice work. I'll add 2 more to the mix (bookmarked these while searching for pure CSS icons recently). To answer the title, yes I'd definitely use one of these

http://nicolasgallagher.com/pure-css-gui-icons/demo/

http://saeedalipoor.github.io/icono/


Really nice icons, good job !

One suggestion for animated icons: add "animated" and "stopped" states if you didn't already.


Thanks! I've tested "stopped" states and have it on my ToDo list, but need to just take a moment and get it done.


I'm going to be completely honest as a UI/UX developer. I already feel completely overwhelmed with viable and awesome options. If you aren't heavily using this, at least make sure it isn't interfering with your life. This has nothing to do with what you've done, just how I feel about more icon libraries in general.


Some of the currencies look a bit off for me: http://i.imgur.com/GhjPBr7.png

I'm using Firefox on Arch. I guess it could be something to do with me not having the right fonts installed.


Yeah there are three currency icons that change a lot between browsers because part of the icon is a character. Definitely doesn't really work. Having trouble finding a way to create the central shape with the 3 available elements. May need to scratch them until I can.

Thanks for taking a look at it!


Nice. A comment on the flags: I find the green of Italy indistinguishable from the blue on other flags, maybe make it lighter or something? And France is inverted: it's blue, white, red and not the other way around.


I do not find the green of Italy indistinguishable from the blues. Maybe you should take a color-blind test (seriously, not being a jackass).


Nice work. But your german and french flags have the wrong order of colors.


Continue Cabell, these are very nice set of icons with a small file size.


Quick PSA: The audio player on the site is an actual audio player.


Nice - although they break up a bit if you zoom the page, sadly.


Not if this is anything more than an academic exercise. Nice effort, but SVG and, to a lesser degree, icon fonts, are better for this sort of thing.


Definitely good for working on a few weird CSS oddities and helped me get better acquainted with GitHub and Bower. I figured being able to work with individual elements within the icon might be a plus over icon fonts, but definitely not as reliable. Otherwise, I also couldn't come up with much over SVG either. Thanks for the feedback!


nicely done, these are pretty cool. like anything interesting in css i'm not sure if they're practical, but they're cool regardless of the practicality.

>to set your own color, simply set the icons border color in your CSS, like so: .lb-, .lb-::before .lb-*::after

could you use border-color:inherit on the :before and :after pseudo-elements, so it's just a single selector change to change the color?


Wow, that makes a ton of sense, definitely cleaner than what I've got going now. There are plenty of places to clean it up, but that would be a big one.

Thanks!


Alternatively, if you leave it off it defaults to currentColor, which means you can set the color property on it or a parent.


It's a neat trick to be able to do this using only css, but SVG is really the more suitable technology fort his type of graphic.


Can you make a bat signal icon with animation?


This is awesome! If there wasn't a compatibility issue, i'd use this immediately.


The swiss flag should be square.


True, thanks for catching that! I'll fix it up.


There are some more problems with the flags. The colours of the french and german flag are in the wrong order. The icelandic and norwegian flags are missing the white line around the cross. The class for the netherlands shouldn't be lb-flag-holland.


keep it going. They look great.


Love it. Also removed bloat bc you can easily kick out icons you're not using.


I like the flags, but wanted to the colour of some flags issue too.


These look amazing! Keep up the awesome work! I love CSS icons.


Great work! Definitely worth continuing.


This is very cool


nice. lot of work!


These so called icons are not even images. What's the point if you cant save them do your hard disk ????




Applications are open for YC Winter 2020

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: