Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So don't publish the shit research in quality journals. Publish them in a general journal for negative findings.

I'd also like to know who conducts quality research and who conducts shit research, cause that might influence my funding/spending patterns (if I had money to spend).




"Shit research" is not equal to negative findings. In fact it may be the opposite. I suspect most bad research has the positive findings the researchers are looking for.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: