Especially since he doesn't seem to have an opinion on anything relevant to the extremely important change the article brings to light, but would rather discuss the editorial quality of the article itself.
An analogy would be people on the sinking Titanic discussing the poor command of the english language by those lads who asked them to get in the boats.
An analogy would be people on the sinking Titanic discussing the poor command of the english language by those lads who asked them to get in the boats.