Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

I think the idea is that the number of studies unpublished because of negative results is a constant across all time scales.

The data here are probably sufficient to do this meta-analysis; looking at publication rate as a function of time between starting the study and registration, rather than looking at an arbitrary cutoff.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact