Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Is it accurate to describe this as a faster Redis that doesn't have all of the useful data structures like lists, sets, etc?



Yes, somewhat.

It's also different from Redis because Redis is intended to be ran as a server (it stands for Remote Dictionary Server). This is ran entirely as a process and communicates via IPC; other machines can't reach the database, only the local machine. This is a big reason for why it's very fast. However, it also means you can't distribute the database across multiple servers.

You could think of it like a very fast NoSQL Sqlite, I guess.


Sounds like some specific collection type that one might build with Boost.Interprocess. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/doc/html/interprocess/a...


I keep wondering why there isn't a libredis you can just link into your program without needing to run a server and all that. It sounds very useful, but I'm not sure how hard it would be to develop.


For the same reason you can't do that with MySQL or Postgres or any other database server. Redis intended to be ran as a server listening for TCP connections, and communicating over a TCP/IP network. If you're running it on localhost, the communication should generally be pretty fast, but you're right that overhead will still be incurred.

It would require adding a lot more code to allow for typical interprocess communication.


Probably. Though it would be inaccurate to say it is in any way equivalent to Redis.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: