Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Any article that takes a body of peer reviewed scientific research, points out some procedural problems, and then--without any supporting evidence--claims that their competing perspective is correct is bullshit. Scientific claims demand scientific refutals, not the agglomerated opinions of the twitter-sphere. This is exactly the same tactic used by climate deniers.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: