Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Ought you? Those are all different bits of hardware. One being subverted doesn't mean the others are - if nothing else, the attacker isn't likely to have a vulnerability for every combination of firmware and chip.

This sort of attack is usually going to be more trouble than it's worth to execute, but that doesn't mean it's out of reach for a motivated, educated individual.

You don't need a combination, just compromising the BIOS gets you root. You don't need to separately compromise the disk firmware, it's either or.

The point is that it's the same kind of attack. Relying on the BIOS may save you from an attack on the disk firmware but that doesn't much help if the same class of attack is still effective against the BIOS.

Sure. My point is there's no guarantee the attacker will be able to compromise the TPM or BIOS just because they can compromise the disk controller.

I'd bet most systems see different disk controllers more often than they see different BIOS chips. I'd bet (though not at so high odds) that reasonably secure TPM chips are relatively easier to find outside of the high-end server niche. I'd bet that most non-state actors executing this sort of attack wouldn't have equivalent exploits ready for many different types of hardware.

All of those factors shift risk around (again, what little risk there is from this sort of vulnerability). Forgetting about patching a hole here because of an equal-sized hole over there is silly.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact