Design: Align your header's (logo, speech bubble) width with the google-advertisement-banner-footer width to make the middle stand out. What's up with affiliates? Put that junk into the box right under the banner. Your copy/link/share link colors are ugly. 2 lines of text max in your description.
Copy: Comma or exclamation after 'Congratulations', period after 'others'. Some of your wording is unprofessional. Don't try to be funny. Some bosses won't look kindly on a site like this just because of your language. For example, your http://isnsfw.com/44dfs6 'porn star' might get hit by someone's work filters and get your site blacklisted.
Good plan. Go find some decent sfw url shortener sites, see if you can set up mutual linking with them ("Have something sfw to share? Try [random friend]"). And do you realize that your source of revenue is under the fold on 900px height netbook screens? Many college students use those.
(When submitting, put your comments into the the actual post, not into a comment. Title should also be 'ask hn, feedback on nsfw-friendly link shortener isnsfw.com')
isNSFW.com aims to fix that.
[added link: http://isnsfw.com/yLyQTM]
Thanks for the feedback
Perhaps you should make the rating optional? If you want people to use this, you should make the number of steps required to a minimum
It would be nice if you could affix multiple content descriptors, much like how the ESRB handles their rating system. See below for a reference:
"Offensive Material: Link contains offensive content such as references to religion, abortion, 911, and the devil."
"Link MAY contain", and 911 should be 9/11 (unless you're referring to the US emergency number)
But this new service seems to have more features, good for them :)
First of all, there is a spelling mistake. Secondly, how is religion, 9-11 or the devil offensive? You may think it's an ironic joke, but most people won't get the joke, and frankly, it's not that funny. So if I were you, I'd not try to joke on that page, but give examples that genuinely describe what could be offensive.
All the same, it's a really great service, and I think it will be big.
This is a nice automated rendition of that.
Seriously, it's a great idea and I would totally implement it if I had the time/motivation.
I'm torn on this one, what do you guys think.