Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Anyone read the wired article on this?... http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/04/pirateverdict.html

Apparently, the prosecution cited a case from 1963 wherein a man was convicted of a crime for holding his friend's coat while the friend was in a fist-fight.

Amazing that such a case happened, and amazing that it was cited as relevant to this case.

Obviously holding the coat of a man in a fight is an extreme case, but isn't being an accessory to law breaking commonly used as a justification for prosecution?


I just don't equate that as accessory. What about the valet that parked his car? What if the man had stolen his coat?


Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact