Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

"a nice URL, perhaps indicative of RESTfulness"

My understanding is that "nice URLs" and "RESTfulness" are orthogonal. Difference implementations of the same RESTful interface could have completely different URL formats and they should all be compatible with clients written to the interface specification.

Having said that, best to have nice URLs and RESTfulness.




Well said.

It's in some ways quite anti-RESTful for a consuming client to start to try parsing a URL semantically. "URL building" is not something a client should be responsible for, it should be (semi-)blindly using URLs the service has provided for it.


Agreed and well said. Nice URLs do not have to be RESTful, but RESTful URLs have to be nice. Personally, its just OK for me if the entire URL looks like:

maps.google.com/whatever-nice-text-describing-location?ll=lat,long

If the lat/long is missing, then ask Maps to do a search. If its present, then its just a "nice" URL. Not necessarily RESTful.

Edit: Formatting


> RESTful URLs have to be nice

Not by any meaningful definition of REST.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: