Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Do Masculine Names Help Female Lawyers Become Judges? Evidence from S. Carolina (mercatus.org)
23 points by mxfh on March 23, 2013 | hide | past | favorite | 12 comments



Fun with small data sets. As far as I can tell, fully 1/3 of the difference they describe is due to a single female judge with the unlikely name of "Bruce". This line is my favorite:

> Moreover, changing a girl’s name from “Sue” to “Bruce” (99% of those named “Bruce” in South Carolina’s voting population are males) increases her probability of becoming a judge by a factor of 5 (roughly).

Right. And changing a boy's middle name to Hussein no doubt increases his changes of reaching the White House by a factor of 1000.


> And changing a boy's middle name to Hussein no doubt increases his changes of reaching the White House by a factor of 1000.

On the other hand, it also vastly increases his chances of getting captured and hanged due to actions of the White House.


Changing a boy's name to Sue, however, is known to lead to very positive outcomes. There was even a poem/song written about it.


Like a good trolling, link bait has have a slight semblance of plausibility to work effectively.


Funniest footnote I've ever read in a paper:

"8. At the request of an anonymous referee, we perform a check on our nominal masculinity measure by examining the score for Bacon Magazine’s “Top 10 Stripper Names.” In theory, female exotic dancers choose hyper-feminized stage names. Only two of those names, Candy and Porsche, had a nominal masculinity of 0. Three other names had nominal masculinity names below the mean female voter. Two other names on the list actually scored quite high in nominal masculinity; Angel had a nominal masculinity of 0.15 (due to its popularity among Spanish speakers as a boy’s name) and Houston had a nominal masculinity of 0.98. These findings suggest the potential for further research, which is beyond the scope of this paper."


Do more masculine names help male lawyers become judges?


Oh good question.


Do studies with very small to small sample sizes end up with strange results?


Yes, 100% of studies (n = 1) agree.


"Masculinity" is defined as "number of men who have this name per number of people who have this name." Seems to me like A)it's difficult to do this test accuracy given the small number of people who have a given name and B)it doesn't necessarily accurately reflect how we perceive the masculinity of a name.

Also, "Because the number of female judges in the data is small, the asymptotic justification for conducting standard hypothesis tests is suspect."

This is an interesting paper, but it seems like it would benefit from a larger dataset.


This has inspired me: if I have a daughter, I'm going to name her Diesel.


in related news, stripes on the side of cars make them drive faster (in south carolina)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: