Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

The initial mistake certainly was the software author's but that's hardly the most important point.

There are at least three key issues brought out by the original post, IMHO:

1) By moving to the App Store distribution from a previous, independent distribution system, publishers have clearly taken a step backwards in terms of being able to push out bug fixes. This is a huge issue and it's irrespective of what other platforms have to live with. It's a clear downgrade of a valuable feature for end-users and that's a problem – particularly because it's largely driven by policy and not technical requirements.

2A) Even worse, Apple's gatekeeping is horribly broken – approval is so opaque as to almost seem arbitrary and therefore cannot be relied upon. This is not the author's fault.

2B) The standards for gatekeeping, such as they are, are not constant. It seems clear that features that were previously acceptable can become no longer acceptable if Apple deems them to be competitive with Apple products. Or, worse, if Apple alters their products in such a way as to overlap with the existing features of a product in the App Store, a program may no longer be approved – essentially without warning and with no grandfathering due to prior approvals.

So, yes, this story says a lot about the controlled environment of a walled garden ecosystem.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact