Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Regular person here who learned to code using VBA with Excel and Access to build spreadsheets and "dashboards" (oh the suits love "dashboards"!!) to track sales for what grew to be a half-billion dollar book of insurance business. The problem with all the "professionals" is that they take forfuckingever to get anything useful and usable to you when you're trying to run an actual business. Plus, you have to sit on endless conference calls trying to explain to some "professional" why you want to see the data the way you want to see it, not the way that's easiest for them to program. And building out the specs. And following their painful changelog process. And waiting some more. And know they're getting paid more than you even though a lot of the time they leave at noon on Friday.

If you want people to use your "professional" code, learn something about how to get it done now. The people who are making it happen right now don't have time for all this. Not everything needs to be engineered - not even the small chunks of the global financial system I have dealt with.




"Not everything needs to be engineered".

This is true. However, in a professional environment, it is reasonable to expect that a professional level of attention and diligence is being applied to most tasks. With a half-billion dollar spreadsheet, it's not going to take much of a rounding error to make that software engineer's salary look insignificant.

You draw a distinction between "professionals" and people who make spreadsheets. Why is that a good distinction? Shouldn't those people have some professional standards too? What are you doing if you don't have time to do a good job on something? Heck, why is it okay for you Excel programmers to not have the same set of standards that the rest of us follow?

Following all these rules of procedure and specs and change requests isn't any more fun from the other side of the table. The point of that stuff is, if the product does not conform substantially to those specifications, the person coding it is (usually) liable. Reimagine your spreadsheet-writing life with the idea that you could be sued into oblivion for any losses incurred by your code, and you might develop an all-new appreciation for testing and specifications.

But you know, maybe it's your money on those spreadsheets.


> The point of that stuff is, if the product does not conform substantially to those specifications, the person coding it is (usually) liable.

Can you point out a single case where a programmer was held personally liable for losses incurred by their code? Just one?

Libility is usually limited to willful wrongdoing and negligence, and when it involves work done by an employee, it's the employer not the employee that's held liable.


I don't think he means liable in the literal sense but in a figurative way: that permanent employee might lose out on a bonus, raise or future greenfield projects if they screw up. A consultant or contractor might not get their contract renewed or told to sod off, depending on the severity.

But you're right about the financial liability: I've never heard it happen; but what with Murphy's Law I'm still retaining a Liability insurance just in case it should ever happen to me.


This sounds like the conversation from the day before the Agile Manifesto was published.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: