Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

More likely you would have great data on atmospheric turbulence.

And, the irregular lenses on all those crappy cameras. (Crappy by astronomical standards.)

There's no way you'd be able to calibrate that out, so you'd never know which pixel on the camera mapped to a given patch on the sky.

Not to mention that the camera body is so compliant that even if you perfectly characterized the lens, once you put the camera in your pocket and took it back out again, it would all be different.

And what about thermal effects? It boggles the mind.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact