Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

This project took 2 years for me to accomplish. I'm pretty excited to share the results. Thanks for looking!

That was really fun reading how you solved some of these problems, especially the rotation correction of the horizon. Amazing that you were able to get a stable panorama out of a tumbling cube of cameras! I really look forward to seeing the video, wasn't able to view it (high traffic or bad browser).

I played with the Quake engine back in 2011 to experiment with how to use and configure a panorama in a game with Lua scripts. You can build your own camera cubes/prisms and use different lenses: http://shaunew.github.com/blinky/)

One of the results of my experiment is that the equirectangular projection is, well, fucking horrible for anything wider than 90 degrees. Lucid.it is a great tool, but no panorama tool should only allow the equirectangular projection. When you zoom out, you notice that the periphery becomes stretched, almost inducing nausea. There are better projections, namely the stereographic ones. You can see an example here of a 180 degree view of a panorama: http://www.ashnu.com/stereo.htm

I would like to get your panorama video working on a stereographic projection. That may require using a different tool or building one.

Also, did you explore the "philopod pitch variation" you mentioned in your first post for just using four cameras instead of six?

I've come across your Quake experiments before, I think. That or someone else has a page on modifying Quake to support stupid high FOV.

4 cameras wouldn't work very well with the cameras I used. It was a struggle with 6 cameras to find enough overlap get good quality stitching.

One thing that would be great is to get cameras that can be arranged in a tight enough configuration that they all share the same non-parallax point. Then, you don't have to do anything fancy to stitch them.

One piece I kind of glossed over is that at lower altitudes the ground is much closer to the camera than the sky. That means that you can't create a general case stitch profile as you're not working from the center of a sphere (in relation to the objects you're trying to use for control points), so as the payload rotates you have to stitch each frame individually. I may play at it some more and try to get a stitched video of the low altitudes of the descent. First, though, I'm going to take a break from the project for a bit.

Congratulations :) great project and awesome shots.

Thanks! It was a ton of working getting here. I'm happy with how the images came out, but not totally happy. I know and see all of the (to me) glaring problems with them.

Fantastic job on this, the results are great despite the challenges you faced. I'm inspired!

Hey, thanks! I'm eager to see what you make. :)

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact