Sure its a bumper sticker slogan but there is some truth to the slogan that "If you outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have guns."
To me the only truly effective way to neutralize criminals or insane irrational people with guns, is to surround them with sane and rational people that peacefully also have guns.
Maybe a better comparison is gun control in other countries.
"Sure its a bumper sticker slogan but there is some truth to the slogan that "If you outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have guns.""
So what, "some truth to it" is a shockingly low standard.
"To me the only truly effective way to neutralize criminals or insane irrational people with guns, is to surround them with sane and rational people that peacefully also have guns."
To me this is nonsense because:
(1) Countries with gun control have neutralized gun violence without arming the entire populace.
(2) Allowing the entire US population to arm freely has had a net negative effect on controlling insane people with guns.
You might ask why the people who fed you this talking point used a clearly deceptive statistic instead of an obvious one like murder.
These are not clearly deceptive statistics. Murder is not the only kind of violent crime.
Allowing people to protect themselves is a great deterrent against violent crime of all types. That is what these statistics point to.
Why do you so easily want to give up these hard-won freedoms?
I just told you why they weren't.
the definitions for “violent crime” are very different in the US and Britain, and the methodologies of the two statistics he cites are also different...
First, it should be noted that the figures Swann gives are out of date...
Second, and more importantly, the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports defines a “violent crime” as one of four specific offenses: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
The British Home Office, by contrast, has a substantially different definition of violent crime. The British definition includes all “crimes against the person,” including simple assaults, all robberies, and all “sexual offenses,” as opposed to the FBI, which only counts aggravated assaults and “forcible rapes.”
When you look at how this changes the meaning of “violent crime,” it becomes clear how misleading it is to compare rates of violent crime in the US and the UK. You’re simply comparing two different sets of crimes.
I just wish people liked guns less.
I dont really think people that like guns are the problem though. I would not classify myself as someone that "likes" guns. On the other hand i know people that "like" guns, and it's not that they likes the power a gun has, but they certainly understand and respect it, and therefore take extra care. They like them because they appreciate them for the same reason that people appreciate works of art, or sportscars. For the Craftsmanship, for the minior details that went into the design of the gun, for the historical value of the gun.
Pretty sure they used large aircraft to kill people and no one is crying tyranny over the idea that large aircraft need a bunch of regulations to ensure public safety.
Guns have absolutely no effect on violence. Treat people better, make sure they have access to opportunity and caring about one another is how you reduce violence.
I own more than my share of guns and they have never made me violent, or invoked violence. I have a few knives, they too have never invoked violence in me.