However, I'm quite curious about the battery life impact. So far the N4 isn't a champion in this category. Adding LTE..
It doesn't jive with my personal experience using the iPhone5 on LTE and 3G
It contradicts Apple's own battery life claims
Devices with the old SOC get dramatically different results on the new test (see for example the results for the HTC OneX in Anand's initial review and compare with the results in the iPhone5 review chart).
LTE battery life with today's SoCs vs 3G on today's SoCs > LTE battery life with last year's SoCs vs 3G on last year's SoCs
with the suggestion is that the improvement is significant enough that LTE battery life isn't the problem it used to be. None of that claims that LTE battery life today is better than 3G battery life today.
 Anecdotally, I'm hoping that's right. I've been on (GSM/UMTS) T-Mobile for years and switched to VZ a few months ago; and I've noticed a marked drop in call quality & stability vs. every GSM phone I've owned.
Just get a bigger battery. I got a 3900 mAh extended battery for my Verizon LTE Galaxy Nexus from Mugen Power. Now my phone can run for 2.5 days without any problems. After a week, I didn't even notice the added thickness.
I think it's more so a side-effect of the relentless push for smaller, thinner devices.
That aligns with the priorities of most consumers. The average consumer is not going to upgrade their hardware — at least, not themselves — but they do want a sleek, slim design.
This is exactly the calculation apple has done; they now deem RAM to be reliable enough to not have a significant impact on warranty claim expenses. This is why they did not solder the (much less mature tech) SSD.
>I think it's more so a side-effect of the relentless push for smaller, thinner devices.
I think this is naive, personally. The extra 3d space of a RAM module on a laptop is minute. The size is a nice bonus. Also i'd bet a very significant chunk of macbook Pro owners upgraded their RAM.
(FWIW I use a Razr M, which also has a sealed battery. Remarkable little phone.)
The iPhone 5 has nearly DOUBLE the battery life of the Nexus 4 for typical usage. If you disable LTE it will be even better.
> "As always we test across multiple air interfaces (3G, 4G LTE, WiFi), but due to the increased network load we actually find that on a given process technology we see an increase in battery life on faster network connections. The why is quite simple to understand: the faster a page is able to fully render, the quicker all components can drive down to their idle power states."
AnandTech's 3G benchmark scores for the iPhone 5 and Nexus 4 are 4.55 and 4.15, respectively. It's only when the iPhone 5 runs on 4G LTE that it scores 8.19.
And while I appreciate AnandTech's quantitative reports, I'm not sure you can call this "typical usage", unless you typically spend all day refreshing web pages.
> typical usage
Are you serious? This pretty much affirms my point that you didn't read the article, unless you consider constantly refreshing web pages at a fixed interval with fixed brightness 'typical usage'.
> If you disable LTE it will be even better.
Apparently you didn't look too closely at the pictures, either. The article contains an entire paragraph (that I'm not going to repeat) that explains why LTE provides better battery life in this particular benchmark. In fact, if you look at the exact same chart you're referencing the iPhone 5 is at 4.55 with LTE disabled, a mere 0.40 more than the Nexus 4.
Your blatant Apple propaganda is getting pretty old.
I'm with Bell Canada and not having LTE is a deal-breaker for me.
You also need a LTE compatible Micro SIM card. Most phones sold by the canadian carriers nowadays do have them, even if they are not 4G.
There really isn't any memory in them. There is value to slow charging, but even more important is temperature and avoiding keeping them near full charge for an extended period of time.
From the same source: http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/battery_calibrati...
Only to a point. The provided charger tends to be well within this limit (no benefit to using USB).
The better takeaway from the article is to keep Li batteries cooler than ~95F to extended their life.
There is also no need to condition Li batteries. Apple used to have you do a calibration step for new batteries, but that was to reset the circuitry that was used to estimate the charge left in a battery. The old replaceable batteries had this built into the battery (the little button you pushed to get the row of green lights.) In new MacBooks this is all factory calibrated.
Constrained supply can be a good marketing technique for a short period time and can drive awareness and a sense of urgency, but the demand needs to be elastic. 12 months after the Wii launched, it was still highly sought and frequently sold out. I don't think we'll be saying the same for the Nexus 4 in November 2013.
That's not to say that the limited number of phones must have been for marketing purposes. The decision could also have been balanced against other manufacturing commitments or other reasons.
O2 sells it at £399.99 with no contract.
Carphone Warehouse, £389.95 with no contract.
In the same shops, the iPhone 5 is basically the same price than on the Apple store.
EDIT: It's not a counter argument, just adding more infos to the subject of pricing.
The Wii was the same way. It was "hard to get" for two Christmases. How is that at all possible? A company misjudges their demand that badly for two years in a row? But really what happened was they just kept a decent pace of manufacturing that satisfied all demand just in time. I never heard of anyone not getting their Wii when they wanted it for either Christmas.
And you really need exactly that: stories of people "getting theirs". So the delays should be somewhat minimal, enough that people can show off getting theirs and tell the story in time for the next person to do the same thing. The Best Buy on Main Street gets deliveries on Tuesday. Come back then!
People mess up forecasting all the time. I've been a personal witness to several instances of this. It usually results in someone getting fired.
Overproduction can be a terrible burden on any company. It is often better to take the low forecast to reduce risk.
>If they actually can provide, but claim they can't, it's false.
Confirmed working on Rogers in Canada. :D
It's not only faster than the HSPA speeds I was getting, but it's faster than my home internet connection from Telus. This is awesome.
I had to add an apn with these settings:
Name - Rogers LTE
MMS Proxy- 10.128.1.69
Apn type 1- (default,supl,mms)
Taken from: http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/13nr12/this_video_s...
The possible win is when T-Mobile eventually rolls out LTE. They are likely to use Band 4... but AFAIK haven't announced when they're ever going to roll it out.
YMMV, but afaik, all stock Samsung builds have retained this feature.
EE UK uses LTE on the 1800Mhz
Here's a list of the LTE networking bands
http://niviuk.free.fr/lte_band.php (nice graphics below)
The other bands he has tested for aren't really in use for LTE yet.
Three's DC-HSDPA network has been excellent with my Nexus 4. I've done a few speed tests and I regularly get between 10-18Mbps down and 2-3Mbps up. It feels really snappy and, at £9.60 a month for a rolling 30 day sim only contract with unlimited data, it's cheap as hell.
how? link/info please?
AFAIK the best they offered was £6.90/mo base + £3/mo for unlimited data. And that was 12month contract where you had to call up to add on the data. ?
I had it in my head that my contract was costing me £9.60 per month while it's actually costing me £12.90 per month. Doh.