Hacker Newsnew | comments | ask | jobs | submitlogin
landr0id 514 days ago | link | parent

I think that ImageShack still imposes bandwidth limits and other restraints. I can't see why anyone would use it over another service like imgur.


tripzilch 513 days ago | link

Depends on what you use them for. Services like ImageShack and Photobucket keep your images around, while (last time I checked, which is admittedly about a year ago) Imgur's FAQ says something about deleting old images that haven't seen any traffic for a certain timespan (at least 3 months, IIRC).

-----

rplnt 514 days ago | link

Imgur has some restrictions as well. It's their (Imageshack's) "view image" pages that are horrible.

-----

jonknee 514 days ago | link

Any host is going to have restrictions, but Imgur will not take your image down for bandwidth reasons.

-----




Lists | RSS | Bookmarklet | Guidelines | FAQ | DMCA | News News | Feature Requests | Bugs | Y Combinator | Apply | Library

Search: