Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

the idea is to cut-out the traditional investors - if a product is good enough to be crowd-funded is the VC really necessary? Are you upset that the 'rebel guy' is doing what he want's to do and only has to give an initial cut to kickstarter instead of a recurring cut/part ownership to the VC?

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact