"This lecture is the intellectual property of Professor S.W.Hawking. You may not reproduce, edit, translate, distribute, publish or host this document in any way with out the permission of Professor Hawking."
bad taste for a person carrying a degree granted by the public.
Besides, is my squid proxy already in violation of this?
EDIT: Seriously, why the downvotes?
Further, the "products of his intellect" are themselves a partially reproduced, edited, or translated versions of documents his has read previously, in all likelihoods. I thought, every scientist (in particular, Mr. Hawking) is aware of this and thus claiming "ownership" of this "product" seems unfair. Hence, I find it bad taste.
Of course, we can now start to argue what does "edit", "reproduce" or "document" mean.
I'd expect more humbleness from people of an academic institution, for the reasons state previously. Slamming the copyright notice into my face before I've even started to read the article, although technically and legally correct, does not qualify in my opinion.