Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submitlogin

There's a very good reason for returning a result as (error_code, resulting_data) instead of just returning a single value of resulting_data and then having the caller check to see if resulting_data is an error.

The problem is that if you count on the caller to check on the error value for the data, he might forget to do that. And the code works just fine in testing, and it seems like it works. But in the error case, we merrily continue on and try to pass the error around as if it were data.

When we return two values, error and data, then the developer is forced to think about the fact that the result could be an error, and think right then about what should happen. THis is a good place to be thinking about it.

Also, the developer may not even know at-a-glance that the function could sometimes return an error, unless consulting the documentation.

Or more succinctly: it's not about making the code easier to write (which the version you mentioned does); it's instead about making it easier to do the right thing.




Applications are open for YC Summer 2015

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Y Combinator | Apply | Contact

Search: