Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

I thought APIs had been established as non-copyrightable by numerous precedents, e.g. Lotus v. Borland, Apple v. Microsoft. Why do we need to go through this again?

The US Copyright Law Chapter 12 provides for reverse engineering, for the purpose of interoperability. So that would seem to negate any defense of copyright of an API, whose sole purpose is interoperability.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact