I'm working on a vendor review workflow where the output is not "an AI answer" but artifacts you can actually use:
- Evidence Pack (PDF) with citations for every claim
- Diff report (what changed between contract versions)
- Approval log (who approved what, based on which evidence)
If a claim can't be backed by evidence, it's marked Unknown.
Demo (synthetic data, no customer data): https://b2apps-hwbghfetgtamcmfb.japanwest-01.azurewebsites.n...
Sample deliverables (PDF/MD): https://b2apps-hwbghfetgtamcmfb.japanwest-01.azurewebsites.n...
Questions:
- In your process, where does most time go: collecting evidence, reviewing diffs, or getting approvals?
- Would "questionnaire-only" (no sensitive docs) be useful as a first step?
