> Are these the people supposedly getting added to the database?
Yes, see the article. There would need to be evidence to the contrary to say otherwise.
> We have no evidence of who's actually being added
That is the nature of a secret enemies list. Keeping it secret is itself malicious, but the directive orders the addition of "agitators, protestors, etc.", making it clear that non-"agitating" protestors are included.
> Like them or not, reporting federal police activities to the people they are investigating is in fact disrupting a federal investigation.
I didn't see any law you cited which says that recording and reporting on those masked, armed thugs who are assaulting and killing lawful protestors and other innocent civilians is illegal. That's why I asked.
> This one's gonna vary a lot based on your location, but generally the 287(g) program that most states signed up for does.
287(g) does no such thing. As for location: Let's use Minneapolis as an example here, so you can be more specific.
Yes, see the article. There would need to be evidence to the contrary to say otherwise.
> We have no evidence of who's actually being added
That is the nature of a secret enemies list. Keeping it secret is itself malicious, but the directive orders the addition of "agitators, protestors, etc.", making it clear that non-"agitating" protestors are included.
> Like them or not, reporting federal police activities to the people they are investigating is in fact disrupting a federal investigation.
I didn't see any law you cited which says that recording and reporting on those masked, armed thugs who are assaulting and killing lawful protestors and other innocent civilians is illegal. That's why I asked.
> This one's gonna vary a lot based on your location, but generally the 287(g) program that most states signed up for does.
287(g) does no such thing. As for location: Let's use Minneapolis as an example here, so you can be more specific.