Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Production-Grade RAG Pipeline for Technical Documentation (alexanderfashakin.substack.com)
1 point by alex_fash 27 days ago | hide | past | favorite | 1 comment


I’ve been experimenting with RAG systems specifically for compliance-heavy technical documentation, and it feels like most RAG advice breaks down in this context.

If the response is wrong, users don’t just get confused - it may be costly legally and financially.

A few things that worked fine for general purpose chatbot RAG failed badly for docs:

Pure semantic search – "authentication" queries pulled login flows and unrelated security guidelines, because embeddings blurred intent. Users needed exact endpoints, not conceptually similar text.

Naive chunking – code blocks and parameter descriptions were split across chunks, producing syntactically valid but operationally wrong examples.

"Best effort" generation – when context was incomplete, the model just filled in the gaps with hallucinations and plausible defaults instead of refusing to answer.

I wrote up what finally worked for me as a production-style pipeline (ingestion → hybrid retrieval → grounding → evaluation).

Curious if others have run into the same problems or solved this differently, especially for docs, APIs, or internal runbooks for highly regulated, compliance-heavy industries? What constraints mattered most in practice?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: