Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

> They are merely useful abstractions

Why are things which are useful and abstract of lesser value than things which are non-useful or non-abstract? Can you give an example of a non-abstraction using your definition of abstraction?

> a lot of things in society don't actually exist

For what reasons should someone accept your personal ontology regarding what exists and what doesn't exist as the objectively correct one?




Applications are open for YC Winter 2016

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: