Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not meaning to single you out specifically, but this entire discussion — all of this license gatekeeping is ridiculous. This is a very cool project, but if the license ruins it for you, there are zillions of open source GPL3 kernels.

I mean, this is not different from bitching about someone writing their custom kernel in C++ instead of Rust, or Zig. It’s not your project! Let people do their own thing! MIT is a perfectly fine license; maybe the lack of zealotry associated with it would even be a positive thing for whatever community might be built around this eventually, if the author is even interested in having other contributions.





Why is a proven effect "ridiculous" to discuss? It's a valid concern and the discussion could make the authors rethink their choice.

That’s the truth



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: