Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Is that the situation here with the 32-bit silent fail default? That it is a sensible default, but could be changed if it's shown that competent devs will nonetheless screw it up?

It's kind of sad that we'd need an example to show that it really could happen in every single specific case. It should be common knowledge by now that competent devs screw things up all the time.

For example, I'm sure the MongoDB devs are extremely competent. But all the same, having a database management system default to letting writes fail silently is a pretty spectacular screw-up. I can't really blame other competent devs for taking it for granted that a DBMS wouldn't do something like that.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact