absolutley!
righteous mad props
and like many I think what I would do when encountering a mucker, though I must give further props to a checkout girl who said that she trys to figure out which items from the shelves can be assembled into serviceable weapons. re: muckers and or zombie attack
They guy is wearing a sign declaring himself to be a 'non-offending pedophile', and you think his big problem could be that he stays awake too late at night?
What does that have to do in a statistical sense with respect to the population of those who would want to commit suicide in the future? Nothing at all. A harmful culture of intentionally ignoring the root causes is exactly what I am talking about.
Your links do nothing to establish any root cause. One is a case report of someone with multiple confounding factors (PTSD, polydrug abuse, prescription drug, and a recent bereavement), the other is a statistical study deducing that more suicides happen at night when you weight for the probability of people being awake. The latter posits being awake at night as a causal factor, but doesn't consider the obvious possibility that suicidality might make it harder for someone to sleep. It says nothing about circadian alignment because the dataset is based on times of death, not prior sleep habits.
These studies don't make a good case for your claim, and as I pointed out the relevance of your claim is highly questionable. If you're struggling with this issue yourself you're better off talking to a doctor than trying to broadcast public service announcements on a weak scientific foundation.
> Your links do nothing to establish any root cause.
Am I going to listen to you, or to what the links directly say:
1. Nighttime wakefulness predicts next-day suicidal ideation,6 and reducing nocturnal wakefulness may reduce suicidal thinking in at-risk populations.7
2. Being awake at night confers greater risk for suicide than being awake at other times of the day, suggesting disturbances of sleep or circadian neurobiology may potentiate suicide risk.
If you actually want to negate the claims, go find yourself a new reference that negates them.
As for your comment:
> If you're struggling with this issue
How dare you. Just piss off, you patronizing jerk. I am not struggling with it, and if I were, I certainly wouldn't take advice from a slimebag.
You misunderstand completely. I said nothing at all about that being acceptable. It just has nothing whatsoever to do with what I said. If you cannot orthoganalize concerns while thinking about them, that's suggestive of a poor education. Furthermore, when you attempt to disallow others from orthogonalizing them, meaning from thinking and speaking about separate concerns separately, then you're a grave detriment to society. The deceit that you showed by accusing someone of something they didn't do or say is more a sign of sociopathy. Between you and the person with the mental illness, the greater hazard looks to be you. I urge you to never partake in a jury because an objective unemotional understanding is not your strong suit, but a witch-hunt is.
