Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Misguided sarcasm. It is indeed a homage.

1) Apple didn't copy the design to make it's own clock rip-off. It is for a very tiny part of their original product.

2) Apple didn't copy the design to sell more iPhones.

3) The design is famous. It's not like Apple sneakily copied it thinking no one will notice.

4) It's a common "click of the eye" gesture to design-savvy public, like their basing their podcast app to classic 60's design, etc.




4) It's a common "click of the eye" gesture to design-savvy public, like their basing their podcast app to classic 60's design, etc.

Or it is just another case of Skeuomorphism gone wild. Not everybody who pays attention to design likes that kind of thing and appreciating it isn't making someone "design-savvy" either.

-----


3) The design is famous. It's not like Apple sneakily copied it thinking no one will notice.

So why didn't they license it?

-----


It seems to me that a lot of people on HN are assuming that this design is an intentional rip-off. It's entirely possible that whoever did the icon didn't realize that they had seen a clock like that before and thus didn't realize they might infringe on someone else's trademark.

-----


That's really unlikely. Those clocks are famous, especially among the types of people who would be in charge of designing a clock at Apple.

-----


Indeed. I don't know much about the designer subculture, but there are a bunch of "iconic" industrial designs that they (should) know about. Another famous one is the IBM wall clock: http://vimeo.com/40953003 (one of the Windows clock gadgets is obviously inspired by it).

(Disclaimer: I am not an Apple fan.) As for the design itself, there is the blatant copying of the seconds hand, but otherwise it seems whoever did it took some care to differentiate the apple clock from the original. E.g. how the lengths of the hour and minute hands relate to the radius of the clock and the size of the hour and minute tick marks. Then of course there are obvious implications of being viewed on a tiny 4" screen. Whether that is enough to build a legal defense on, I have no idea.

-----


They should just license it. I think all the people who are saying it's analogous to the Apple/Samsung debacle are reaching though. No one is going to walk into a store with the intent of buying a Mondaine watch and leave with an iPhone instead.

-----


No, but it's very likely that would-be customers will now look at Mondaine watches and say "how cheap; they just copied the iPhone!"

-----




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: