I'd assume this (at least to the extent of whatever is published before a license is specified) be automatically assumed to be MIT license or something. Is that right?
If a license that is more restrictive than that assumed default is chosen, can it be retroactively applied to the content that was published before it was chosen?
None of these are rhetorical, I'm curious how this works
I'd assume this (at least to the extent of whatever is published before a license is specified) be automatically assumed to be MIT license or something. Is that right?
If a license that is more restrictive than that assumed default is chosen, can it be retroactively applied to the content that was published before it was chosen?
None of these are rhetorical, I'm curious how this works