I don't know what you're trying to say, at all, really, because you were very condescending and now, very short.
"For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear" is false.
"For base-load 24/7 power the cleanest, by far, option w/r/t greenhouse gases is nuclear" is true.
"For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear (as part of the mix)" is nigh-unparsable.
In any case, it's unreasonable to claim I thought the following was false:
For base-load 24/7 power the cleanest, by far, option w/r/t greenhouse gases is nuclear
Nothing in my comment could plausibly indicate it. In fact, my comment says: "Only real argument is "but you need _something_ for base load""
Also in any case, your tone in both cases has robbed us of a positive interaction, in favor of you getting to feel good, but really smug, for 30 seconds after your first comment.
"For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear" is false.
"For base-load 24/7 power the cleanest, by far, option w/r/t greenhouse gases is nuclear" is true.
"For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear (as part of the mix)" is nigh-unparsable.
In any case, it's unreasonable to claim I thought the following was false:
For base-load 24/7 power the cleanest, by far, option w/r/t greenhouse gases is nuclear
Nothing in my comment could plausibly indicate it. In fact, my comment says: "Only real argument is "but you need _something_ for base load""
Also in any case, your tone in both cases has robbed us of a positive interaction, in favor of you getting to feel good, but really smug, for 30 seconds after your first comment.