The AI submissiveness of courts is concerning. $500 billion promised investments are hard to argue against. Is this the new killer app for the broligarchs? Disgusting.
I don't think this has that much to do with AI interests outside of determining that AI generated images fall closer to "animated" laws than "real subject" ones.
I don't know about that. The legal questions here are similar to those presented by human drawings/paintings, ie are such materials contraband even if they are fictional rather than documentary in nature. Of course, AI makes it vastly easier to produce because it requires little time or talent to operate, but you can imagine a similar case involving a finely-rendered pencil drawing.
