dang, I don't think those two submissions really belong together.
The other link discussion is focusing "terms of use" part, which requires at least some legal knowledge to understand - and there is a great discussion if this matters or not.
This submission is about very simple change in the website. While it is undoubtedly related to terms of use change, then changes are in the accessible English, and it is much easier to talk about. You don't need to know anything about US law to see how one day there was a promise and next day it is gone without trace.
I think that "no more promises" is very important by itself, and merging it with "tos" discussion will make it less visible.
I hear you but (to the best of my memory) I looked pretty carefully at this discussion before merging it into the other one, and the comments here weren't focused on this specific aspect—rather, they were generically about the overall story (FF terms of use), as one would expect.
The other link discussion is focusing "terms of use" part, which requires at least some legal knowledge to understand - and there is a great discussion if this matters or not.
This submission is about very simple change in the website. While it is undoubtedly related to terms of use change, then changes are in the accessible English, and it is much easier to talk about. You don't need to know anything about US law to see how one day there was a promise and next day it is gone without trace.
I think that "no more promises" is very important by itself, and merging it with "tos" discussion will make it less visible.