| ||Ask HN: On Rob Pike's Concurrency is not Parallelism?|
51 points by lazydon on July 28, 2012 | hide | past | web | favorite | 70 comments |
|This is regarding slides by Rob Pike with above title. Every time I go thru this I feel like a moron. I'm not able to to figure out the gist of it. It's well understood that concurrency is decomposition of a complex problem into smaller components. If you cannot correctly divide something into smaller parts, it's hard to solve it using concurrency.|
But there isn't much detail in slides on how to get parallelism once you've achieved concurrency. In the Lesson slide (num 52), he says Concurrency - "Maybe Even Parallel". But the question is - When and How can concurrency correctly and efficiently lead to Parallelism?
My guess is that, under the hood Rob's pointing out that developers should work at the level of concurrency - and parallelism should be language's/vm's concern (gomaxprocs?). Just care about intelligent decomposition into smaller units, concerned only about correct concurrency - parallelism will be take care by the "system".
Please shed some light.
HN Discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3837147
| Apply to YC