Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> many studies of nutritional epidemiology that try to link dietary exposures to disease outcomes are founded on really dodgy data

I wonder if the data are always skewed in a particular direction. For example, do people typically underreport junk food and overreport salads? Or do they omit entire meals? Or snacks?




While far from being a potential silver bullet, I do wonder if continuous glucose monitoring could help with this. Your food log shows you didn't eat anything between noon and six in the evening but the glucose monitor shows a spike at 2PM? Your diet app could ask if you forgot to log something around that time. Maybe you want for a long walk aside while it was cold and that was the cause. Unless the question is asked, the tracking data for that time period will be questionable.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: