Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Instead of selling a license to use, you sell some sort of authentication service. So that when the actual right to use is transferred, the new owner would need to pay for the authentication service.

I sorta feel/hope such clear attempts to avoid the law by trying some sort of Jedi hand wave would not pass muster with the courts.




They wouldn't. That's why law's so much about intent and interpretation--to avoid trivial workarounds like that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: