Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

i am not convinced the rise of celiac is not due to some combination of better testing/new thresholds and more awareness to get testing






if you actually read the article it's basically a negative result

I actually did and it said: "While the proportion of critically viewed gliadins fell by around 18 percent, the proportion of glutenins rose by around 25 percent."

Sure, you can say one thing is a little bit lower and another thing is a little bit higher, so it is the same. But as I always said: Units! Units! Units!

Maybe the glutenins are underrated?


and also that any drift over time is swamped by weather effects

What's your background?

professional critical thinker

Actual lol. Thank you :)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: