Is it trying to say NaNoWriMo used AI to determine whether to accept people? (Which nothing in the article supports.)
Or is it a wrongly capitalised and misleading attempt to paraphrase their acceptance of the use of AI?
[1] https://nanowrimo.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/299334559314...
I am asking about the title of this Hacker News submission, which appears to say something unsupported by the facts. (Or at least is ambiguously worded.)
Is it trying to say NaNoWriMo used AI to determine whether to accept people? (Which nothing in the article supports.)
Or is it a wrongly capitalised and misleading attempt to paraphrase their acceptance of the use of AI?