Someone implements an attribution model to track which marketing channels have better ROI than others, and then that attribution model informs all investment and strategic decisions.
The issue is that every attribution model has some inherent flaw or limitation (usually quite significant ones too), so by bending your investment to align with the results you see from a model you're forcing the flaws and limitations of the model onto your strategy.
As companies grow and become more risk averse pleasing the attribution model becomes more and more important for teams and the company loses sight of what the attribution model was even trying to model in the first place.
The question I’d like to see asked of Steve is why solo developers were able to make more reliable, faster, less buggy Reddit mobile apps than Reddit itself?
To this day I have strange bugs on the Reddit app. The logo disappears sometimes, and it’s critical for navigation. The interface sometimes stops responding to presses of certain on-screen elements.
And yet this company pushed out third party app developers in an incredibly shitty way rather than hiring them.
I’ll never forgive Steve for the loss of Apollo on iOS and the way Reddit handled the situation.
I actually understand the API restrictions and even believe that they may lead to better privacy for Reddit users. Free API access meant lots of archiving and cloning services out there when ideally the users should be able to delete their comments and posts to be forgotten if they choose. However, I think that better developer communication could have meant that we still have Apollo around, even if it meant a shift to a paid subscription.
spez when killing 3rd party apps, banning moderators, and alienating users: "We’ll continue to be profit-driven until profits arrive."
spez when licensing user content to OpenAI and Google for millions of dollars: "A lot of how I think about Reddit, it comes not from the numbers, but from the feel of using the app."
The website (post redesign) is absolutely awful too, I have no idea how they ever thought it was good to roll out. Feels like a hacked together college project.
> The question I’d like to see asked of Steve is why solo developers were able to make more reliable, faster, less buggy Reddit mobile apps than Reddit itself?
Seems the answer is already in the title: Reddit is so busy trying to chase the future that it can't see what's in front of them.
Not "forgiving" them is academic if you remain on a platform despite its hostility to its users. I deleted a history of over 10,000 comments and moved on rather than stay and use their crappy official app. (And generally worsening user experience.)
If everyone did that, we'd no longer have platforms that mandate using first party apps. A platform would have to answer the question you asked, whereas now they're free to ignore it.
I don’t think that’s 100% true. In an alternate universe I might be paying Reddit $5-10 a month to use a third party app like Apollo and would have been a happy camper.
In another alternate universe, the Reddit app is made so well that third party apps can’t compete. Consumer sentiment is high and everyone in the community strongly recommends their premium subscription with their amazing app through word of mouth, and I happily convert to a paid customer.
But in the status quo I am certainly a low-value or potentially negative-value user. I don’t comment, post content, or click on ads. I don’t pay them for premium features. I mostly leech off their content delivery network, and Reddit can’t monetize people like me in the way that Meta can. The proof is in their financial statements.
I’m mostly there for certain subreddits that just aren’t replicated elsewhere and my screen time on the app is dramatically lower than it was with Apollo. My foot is already 3/4 out the door.
I agree. But to be clear they didn’t kill them altogether. There are still their party apps that use a subscription to pay for the API.
The problem is that the best app on iOS, Apollo, had its developer chased away.
And really it was about communication and trust rather than an unwillingness to sell a paid app. He also expressed dismay over the short timeline to adapt his business since he already sold his customers paid versions of his app, so changing everything abruptly or forking the app to being something like “Apollo 2” would be screwing his own customers over.
But if Reddit had communicated the changes more clearly and had treated him better in general I think he would have kept the app. Instead Reddit basically burned the bridge and the dev didn’t need the bullshit anymore.
That is the month I made my Lemmy account. It’s smaller and quiet, not as many niche communities, but I’ll take that over rot economy platforms any day. I left Reddit after 10 years specifically because of the API debacle and how it affected Apollo.
Same. Lemmy is smaller and quieter, as you said, but the conversations are generally less toxic (unless you seek out the corners of the fediverse where people like to argue) and there's certainly more of a sense of community there
I still use Reddit, but I gave up on productively contributing to it.
The only account I use now is purely for NSFW reddits, which Reddit will not display advertising for, and I don’t post questions or write comments. They serve me media they host, incurring the costs of storage and data transfer, and get nothing from me in return.
Yea but I can tell you based on experience that there’s definitely that top tier of people who care about this stuff and comment very thoughtfully that has disappeared from the platform. I routinely see wrong answers or just bad comments bubble up to the top of a thread.
Reddit somehow employs in the order of 2000 people, and yet everything that they build, from their mobile apps to their new web UI is unusable.
Until Reddit showed it to be possible, I could never have imagined that a business could employ so many people, and incinerate so much cash but yet have so little to show for it in terms of either profit or a usable product.
Well, if they had offered to buy Apollo and rebrand that as the official app, the world would be a different place to the tens of thousands of people their actions offended enough for them to permanently quit reddit and delete their accounts.
HN doesn’t comply with GDPR either so that’s not saying much though.
Not defending the guy or Reddit which I think are both inherently unethical things. Just that this site also violates GDPR so maybe don’t mention that one.
If you don’t believe me, try to delete your HN account. It’s kinda funny how it works and the response they send about why they can’t delete it.
I didn't know HN and dang were so brazen about this, good to know. The Reddit case does seem quite a bit worse, not in the least because they sell actual products to EU users, unlike HN.
Someone implements an attribution model to track which marketing channels have better ROI than others, and then that attribution model informs all investment and strategic decisions.
The issue is that every attribution model has some inherent flaw or limitation (usually quite significant ones too), so by bending your investment to align with the results you see from a model you're forcing the flaws and limitations of the model onto your strategy.
As companies grow and become more risk averse pleasing the attribution model becomes more and more important for teams and the company loses sight of what the attribution model was even trying to model in the first place.
reply