Always glad to see cooperation across borders when it comes to the issue of cyber security.
That said....the way this article phrased the IP issue is weird. iPV4 is so valuable so I'd assume that some poor user will endup getting one of these IP's via CGNAT or purchasing them for a static IP because of needs for a business.... And might not realize their IP address is been tarnished reputation wise which will kill any services they run on that IP.
That said....the way this article phrased the IP issue is weird. iPV4 is so valuable so I'd assume that some poor user will endup getting one of these IP's via CGNAT or purchasing them for a static IP because of needs for a business.... And might not realize their IP address is been tarnished reputation wise which will kill any services they run on that IP.
Am I misunderstanding things here?