Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submitlogin
Ask HN: Who is using Go language?
93 points by FlyingSnake 777 days ago | comments
I read a lot about Google Go on Hacker News. Is it as good as we read here? What are its benefits?

Is anyone using Go language in real world projects?



stock_toaster 777 days ago | link

Apparently youtube is: http://code.google.com/p/vitess/

as well as heroku: http://blog.golang.org/2011/04/go-at-heroku.html / https://github.com/ha/doozerd

edit: more here http://go-lang.cat-v.org/organizations-using-go

-----

depr 777 days ago | link

in http://www.infoq.com/presentations/High-Availability-at-Hero... one of their engineers says they don't actually use Doozer at the moment

-----

stock_toaster 777 days ago | link

huh. Did they mention why?

(dont have time to watch it right now)

-----

stock_toaster 776 days ago | link

Ended up watching it, and at the end they said that doozer solves a problem that they don't currently have. He really didn't go into why. Maybe because it was a heroku project he didn't want to talk bad about it? No idea.

Interesting talk by the way.

-----

ExpiredLink 777 days ago | link

Apparently Google isn't a heavy Go user and has no plans to become one.

-----

ori_b 777 days ago | link

That's not a comment on the technical benefits. It's a comment on turning around battleships.

Porting large projects is lots of work, especially when there's plenty of stuff to do that directly impacts the customer. New projects are a different story.

-----

oconnor0 777 days ago | link

And it's not even necessarily a good idea to port large projects - completely ignoring the complexity of doing a port while continuing further development and maintenance on an existing product.

-----

azernik 777 days ago | link

Well, given that YouTube is one of Google's most resource-intensive sites (remember that acquisition back in 2006?), I'd say that alone makes them a pretty heavy user; plus, that's just the bit they've open-sourced. The Go team makes constant reference to assorted internal infrastructure projects for which Google uses Go, but which have not been and which probably never will be publicized.

-----

stock_toaster 777 days ago | link

youtube is part of google, and apparently all mysql requests at youtube now go through vitess (or so I read). That strikes me as pretty heavy use.

I recall reading somewhere that Go was used for some other internal projects, but never heard what exactly for. So maybe it was just someone talking about some greenfield "20% time" projects or something.

-----

duaneb 777 days ago | link

This is flat out wrong.

-----

cleverjake 777 days ago | link

what? could you elaborate?

-----

drivebyacct2 777 days ago | link

And... where and how did you draw such a conclusion?

-----

georgemcbay 777 days ago | link

I've been using Go for a few months on a few different projects. Neither are my "day job".

The first project is a Google Music player app for Chumby devices (and other similar ARMv5/v6 class devices... will probably port to Raspberry Pi if/when I ever get one). The project is pure Go at this point with its own UI toolkit based on an mmaped /dev/fb.

The second project is a web service API for mobile apps plus an associated webserver.

I hope more companies adopt Go, making it a viable language for commercial programming. Using it is the most fun I've had coding in years.

-----

depsypher 776 days ago | link

I'm hoping to use Go on a Raspberry Pi (and am currently waiting patiently for it to arrive)... but this bug worries me: http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=909

Anyone know if it's a dealbreaker? I'm planning on running a webserver on it, so I imagine a GC bug would likely manifest after running long enough.

-----

tuxychandru 776 days ago | link

The bug affects application dealing with large integers which can be seen as a valid pointer within the program's address space. So, this will affect your app if it deals with large ints.

There is also work underway to make the GC more precise which will avoid this problem in future.

-----

nemik 777 days ago | link

Oh, so is the ARM support decent now? Last I read (probably too long ago) it wasn't very good.

I'm still using Lua in embedded projects. It's nice, nixio libs make is very nice and integrates with C ever so easily when needed.

-----

luriel 776 days ago | link

The ARM port has improved greatly from how it was before Go1 (and even more so from where it was when Go was first announced).

x64 is still the best supported arch, but everything should work on ARM fine (and quite a few optimizations have gone into that port recently, but you will need to build from the tip for that).

-----

drivebyacct2 777 days ago | link

If you aren't already, there are probably many people that would enjoy taking a look at that ui toolkit.

-----

eikenberry 777 days ago | link

We are using it at Janrain [ http://janrain.com ] for a web-hook/callback system. It will go into production over the next few weeks and is an important feature which will need to deal with a heavy load.

It has worked out great so far. Might write about our experiences once it has a few miles on it.

-----

stock_toaster 777 days ago | link

please do!

-----

micro_cam 776 days ago | link

We (a group at the Institute for Systems Biology) use it for some cluster management software (http://code.google.com/p/golem/) that coordinates 10's of thousands of core hours most days. The consistency and compactness and fast compilation of the language make it a joy to work in and the concurrency features and packages for basic http and web sockets etc make it great for wiring up distributed infrastructure. The standard go packages for http are so much better then the python ones it isn't even funny.

We leave our processes running for months and memory usage stays quite low and stability good which is surprising considering the minimal time spent in development (note: we run on 64 bit linux). (Actually the other day I realized we had generated 24 gb log file because no one had restarted the master process in months.)

We still use other languages for linear algebra heavy things or things that benefit from a more complete webframework (in terms of both features and documentation) but I am hoping the go ecosystem develops in those areas.

-----

joshfraser 777 days ago | link

We are using Go at Torbit. We can write high level code and still get C-like performance. It gives us the rapid development of an interpreted language, with the stability and performance of a compiled language.

-----

joshfraser 777 days ago | link

Oh, and we're hiring Go engineers too! http://torbit.com/jobs

-----

BarkMore 777 days ago | link

The job title is "Golang Developer". Are you really looking for people who identify with a programming language and not programming in general? Also, it's called Go, not Golang.

-----

scarecrow 777 days ago | link

Well if you're looking for someone to work on Go code you will look specifically for Go programmers. People who can already write idiomatic Go code.

Golang is also a better term, due to the fact that "Go" means a lot of different things and is extraordinarily difficult to search for.

-----

BarkMore 776 days ago | link

There's a difference between an X programmer and a developer with programming experience in language X. The former is either incapable, unwilling or not expected to program in anything other than X. The latter has no implied limitations.

In the specific case where X is Go, requiring previous experience is a signal that the company might not be hiring skilled developers. Skilled developers can learn Go quickly because of the language's small size and consistency.

-----

joshfraser 776 days ago | link

You're right. Most of our guys are using Go for the first time. What I should have said is we use Go at Torbit and we're hiring. If you want to program in Go and work on technology that touches millions of people every day, come join us!

-----

joshfraser 777 days ago | link

Yeah, I know. But we also want it to show up in Google so we use the term that is searchable.

-----

CyberFonic 776 days ago | link

I'm using Go with Google AppEngine. Seems to be about an order of magnitude less resource intensive than the Python versions of the apps. Not exactly surprising, considering that Google developed the language. And of course the team has leveraged the learnings from C / Unix and Inferno.

Don't forget that the Go suite contains C compiler and assembler as well for multiple platforms. In the Inferno version it was very easy to do cross-platform compilations.

-----

bkaradzic 776 days ago | link

At Carbon Games we're using Go for backend servers, including game sessions server. If you go and play AirMech multiplayer game right now, you'll be playing it on server written in Go.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hdahlabpinmfcemhcb...

There is also Windows build if you prefer that over Chrome: https://www.carbongames.com/download.html

-----

jemeshsu 777 days ago | link

Youtube, Heroku, Canonical, BBC Worldwide, ngmoco, smugmug, Spotify... Golang is strange, need to write some Go codes in order to appreciate the language design decision.

-----

jrussbowman 777 days ago | link

I have just started playing with it primarily to rewrite chatfor.us as I want to see if I can build the full stack without extra dependencies. Chatfor.us uses zeromq and tornado along with virtualenv so I am hoping with go I can speed up development as well as take better advantage of multi core systems with less dependence on load balancing.

I was already planning on rewriting the authentication to work with more than just twitter so it seemed like a good time to try rewriting it in go. Also go is supposed to have a really nice mongodb db interface so I wanted to give that a try as well.

-----

jrussbowman 777 days ago | link

I guess I should note this is a personal project, basically a hobby. If I had more time I would probably be focusing on tornado more. I'm a weirdo who finds learning new languages relaxing

-----

sciurus 777 days ago | link

Anchor uses it for orchestra, which is "a suite for managing the reliable execution of tasks over a number of hosts."

http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2011/08/the-automation-waltz/ https://github.com/anchor/Orchestra

-----

4ad 777 days ago | link

I am a systems engineer, I worked a lot in filesystems and filesystem-like things. About one year ago I started using Go instead of C for new projects, with the exception of kernel programming where the existing environments are too different for Go to integrate well. I'm very happy, I don't want to go back.

-----

shortlived 777 days ago | link

What exactly are you writing and what do you see as the big improvements vs C in your day to day work?

-----

SoftwareMaven 776 days ago | link

I am seriously considering Go for a portion of a desktop application. This portion needs to be cross-platform (Linux, OS X, and Windows), thread-aware, and safe (I really don't want buffer overruns raining on my parade).

I would also prefer to have a single executable as opposed to a run time that has to be installed first, especially since I want to be able to sign the executable.

Are there any other options out there that fits the bill? I don't consider C or C++ safe. Python, ruby and others are safe, but they aren't wrapped up as conveniently (especially on Windows). C# would work on Windows, but is less than ideal on OS X and Linux (but it is a contender, thanks to Mono).

-----

nadinengland 773 days ago | link

I cant find the exact link to what I'm thinking of (I'll pop back if I do) but there are tools that package ruby scripts up with the runtime into one executable, especially on windows. There was one that could produce executables for many platforms, in the meantime take a look at https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/categories/packaging_to_executa...

-----

pcwalton 776 days ago | link

Disclaimer: Shameless plug; I work on Rust.

Since you asked, you may be interested in Rust as well. It's designed for exactly this use case, with a focus on safety and real-time requirements. However, be warned that it's not at all mature yet.

There's also D, which has quite good Windows support from what I hear.

-----

jaybill 776 days ago | link

I am. It's pretty amazing. All performance benefits of C, none of the language drawbacks. (No offense to C.)

I have a few apps in production already and I'm only doing new stuff in Go.

-----

batista 776 days ago | link

>I am. It's pretty amazing. All performance benefits of C, none of the language drawbacks. (No offense to C.)

Actually the "all performance benefits of C" is not quite true. Go ranks slightly slower than Java, and 2-3X the speed of C/C++.

-----

jaybill 773 days ago | link

I'm curious what benchmarks you're deriving that from. I've not found that to be the case at all.

-----

bmnbug 772 days ago | link

I found go is lot faster than Java with any code that is more than 3 lines long. I have not tesed it but I am sure it is lot faster for fewer lines of code.

Haven't had time to benchmark against c.

-----

zmj 777 days ago | link

I'm using it for some personal projects. A variety of web servers, mostly.

The standard HTTP/networking libraries and goroutine model are fantastic.

-----

zemo 777 days ago | link

I'm using it on a fairly substantial web back end for a new mobile startup. I've also used it in the past at hackathons. I'm a big fan, overall.

-----

aflott 777 days ago | link

Part of my DVR system uses Go https://github.com/aflott/syncgenie

-----

eternalban 777 days ago | link

> Is it as good as we read here? What are its benefits?

C - pain.

[+ps]: well, the concurrency model is quite nice, too.

-----

jff 777 days ago | link

I use it to serve my personal website and blog. I've also helped develop and maintain a cluster management tool written in Go.

-----

philh 777 days ago | link

> Is it as good as we read here? What are its benefits?

Just as importantly, what's bad about it? Or if you don't want to say something like (e.g.) syntax can be "bad", what do you dislike? What changes would you make if you were designing it?

-----

jesstaa 776 days ago | link

The bad parts of Go are mostly the tradeoffs you have to make for a systems programming language. They have benefits but also some unfortunate downsides. Some are just implementation details that will get solved over time.

* integers overflow

* sharing memory between threads isn't safe

* mutable state/ shared state

* nil pointers

* block scoping can lead to multiple different variables with the same names within a function. Sometimes confusing.

* value types limit certain conversions. eg. you can't convert an []int to an []interface{} directly because an int and an interface{} are different sizes in memory.(http://golang.org/doc/go_faq.html#convert_slice_of_interface)

* Error handling can become quite verbose if you don't design your code to limit the places errors can come from.

* gofmt is awesome, but in some rare situations the default format makes code less clear, so you have to change your style of code to fit the formatting.

* 'go get' is awesome, but it's lack of centralisation makes it harder to find the good 3rd party libraries amongst the bad/incomplete ones.

* The current goroutine scheduler is really simple and moves goroutines between threads and CPUs. This leads to lots of cache misses, so running on many threads can become slower than running on a single thread.

-----

peterfunny 773 days ago | link

"nil pointers" is a tradeoff for you?

Block scoping, too?

-----

jesstaa 759 days ago | link

It's possible to never have nil pointer dereferences. But the tradeoff is constructors and some complicated scoping.

Block scoping is confusing for many people coming from the dynamic languages where scoping is usually function level.

-----

tutufan 770 days ago | link

No exceptions. Like C, it's not failsafe. That is, if you don't check the error status of (say) I/O operations, you lose.

-----

Ziomislaw 767 days ago | link

Well it depends, if you want a feature that is _called_ 'exception', than no, there is none.

If you want a feature that allows you to signal and catch errors, than:

* you can return Error as the second parameter from a function,

* you can panic and later defer a recover call (more info: http://blog.golang.org/2010/08/defer-panic-and-recover.html )

-----

FlyingSnake 777 days ago | link

I was intrigued by it and wanted to learn it for a small web project. I was trying to get an objective view to avoid drinking the kool-aid.

-----

jtregunna 774 days ago | link

Go is one of those languages I'd like to use more, but can't find a good fit for the kind of work I do (I mostly write iOS apps, and programming languages myself (weird dichotomy I know)).

-----

tahu 777 days ago | link

I'm successfully using it in my web usage data mining BSc thesis.

-----

hpcorona 774 days ago | link

We're using it for all our toolchain in our small first game. We've also created a small build system based on v8 (javascript), but integrated it using go, it generates all your project so you just need to compile it.

We were using it also for our web page (a custom blog engine made on go), but, we left it on alpha, and Go 1 changed a lot, gofix didn't fixed and priorities made us choose another tool for our web page.

Still, i think go only needs a desktop GUI toolkit to become popular. It has a lot of potential.

-----

Kilimanjaro 777 days ago | link

I've played with it building blogs, forums, polls and everything the web can handle, so yes, let me tell you Go can do it all. Easily.

-----

Kilimanjaro 777 days ago | link

Like in any language, if you can access a database and print, that's all you need to do web pages:

    func Blog(ctx app.Context) {
        data := models.GetPosts(ctx,10)
        ctx.Render(app.Templates+"blog.html",data)
    }
Deliciously simple.

-----

isidl 774 days ago | link

Docs Detective is using Go for its main document comparison algorithm. Its running on App Engine, where most of the app is in Java. Cross-language communication is done via the shared datastore and web-hooks.

-----

obxerve 775 days ago | link

gobl.googlecode.com - a small web CMS

-----

jgrahamc 777 days ago | link

Me

-----

FlyingSnake 777 days ago | link

Could you please elaborate the application? Are there any benefits over other languages(python/clojure/ruby etc)?

-----

elimisteve 777 days ago | link

I also use Go. Roughly 80% of the code I write is still Python (Django apps), but there are times when Go just makes the most sense... so that's what I use.

Whenever speed is key, I use Go. Its concurrency primitives are dead simple. It has excellent support for cutting-edge technologies like WebSockets and SPDY (these libraries/"packages" were written by Google), as well as MongoDB (see "mgo").

I'm using Go in production (for an almost-complete MVP). For a telephony app I had to dial 100 simultaneous phone numbers to bring people into conference calls. Trying that in Python maxed out my EC2 instance's resources. I had to kill and restart it from the AWS web interface.

Then I rewrote that part in Go. I was staring at the output of htop (similar to top) when it ran and thought something was wrong; it used a few megs of RAM, no noticeable CPU, and finished in 0.59 seconds _on a micro instance_. Now you can see why Google wanted such a language!

I never appreciated static typing ("who wants to go from Python to Java or C++?") until Go, which makes very heavy use of type inferencing. The upshot is you'll find yourself declaring types 0 times instead of twice in Java. In Python and Ruby you don't declare them at all, resulting in type errors _all over the place_ and programs that run ~20 times slower; see http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=al....

The Go compiler tells me which lines contain the type errors. Usually my program is correct once these errors are gone. Can't say the same for Python, whose apps can run for days before a corner case is hit, exposing a type error that would've been caught at compile time in Go.

It's interesting that you mentioned Clojure. Well, it's powerful alright, but I found it to be extremely complicated (does a language _really_ need 4 kinds of concurrency and to consist of literally 500 functions?)

If you believe as I do -- as do most who appreciate small, simple, but extremely powerful languages like Python and C -- that simplicity is a feature, you will love Go. If you love Java, C++, D, and other huge languages, consider those or something like Scala or Clojure instead. IMO, doing so means giving up clarity/comprehensibility for a longer list of features, almost all of which _can_ be useful, but all of which make mastering the language much more difficult.

Go has been my favorite language for about a year now. Its only weakness is lack of library and/or framework support, which is an occasional bummer.

That said, I very strongly recommend giving Go a try if you haven't already. I played with Clojure for months till it finally made sense and I saw how powerful it _could_ be, but I still couldn't do anything with it that I couldn't do in Python.

After 2 hours with Go (1.5 years ago), I wrote my first ever concurrent program... _trivially_. This can not be stressed enough. Want a function call to `f` to be non-blocking? Type `go f()`. Yes, it's that simple. Launch a couple functions like that, and bam, you're doing extremely efficient concurrent programming.

If you want the convenience of Python or Ruby plus the speed and type safety of C++, give it a shot! http://golang.org

-----

jgrahamc 777 days ago | link

I am using it at CloudFlare for a backend application for optimizing HTTP connections. It consists of a server and client portion doing connection multiplexing, compression and a bunch of other low level stuff. The project has not been made public yet (but will be which I'll be able to talk about it more).

I could not have imagined writing this in Python or Ruby and I don't know Clojure at all.

Go was good because it's close to a systems language and has great concurrency mechanisms. The program makes extensive use of goroutines and channels for communication. I also make use of a large number of packages from the Go library as well as one external package for memcached integration.

The total code is about 4,000 lines.

-----

FlyingSnake 777 days ago | link

Go is very intriguing and many people commented that it feels natural to code in Go. Do you share the same view?

Did you run into any difficulties managing 4000 lines of code?

-----

ssmall 777 days ago | link

So whenever people ask me about Go, I try and get them to keep in mind this isn't meant to be a competitor to python/ruby or any of that. Approach it from the mindset of a C guy and it will look amazing. The biggest benefits over python/ruby are static typing and that it is compiled. I know static typing isn't popular around here but it has its benefits. I love go and I know web programming is possible in it, but I'd never use it for that. To me it shines at system level services, embedded linux, and anything with high performances and reliability requirements without real time requirements.

We were actually having a talk today about using it here on an embedded Linux device we produce. I'm not very confident anything will come of it but I think it would be a good fit.

-----

breadbox 777 days ago | link

Indeed. There's been so much focus on interpreted langauges these days, compiled languages seem to be all but forgotten. C++ is the last new compiled language that's caught on. (There are others, like D, which are hanging in there, but don't seem to be gaining ground.) Go seems to have potential to grow into a successful compiled language.

-----

pjmlp 774 days ago | link

While I share your point of view, being a bit pedatic, I would like to note that most JVM and .NET languages are also compiled.

-----

breadbox 773 days ago | link

Compiling to a virtual machine is only one step up from byte-compiling, which hardly counts. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one.

-----

pjmlp 772 days ago | link

Microsoft .NET always JITs the code, there is no VM bytecodes being executed on runtime. If you prefer you can AOT your application with NGEN.

Mono also offers the possibility to fully AOT your .NET application.

Most Java VMs can be made to fully JIT the code, bypassing any interpretation with flags similar to -XX:CompileThreshold in Hotspots' case.

If you prefer compile Java directly to native code, you can make use of gcj, Aonix Perc or Excelsior JET.

Language != Implementation

-----

stock_toaster 777 days ago | link

  >  The biggest benefits over python/ruby are static typing and that it is compiled.
I find channels, interfaces, and attaching functions to data (as apposed to attaching methods and data to objects) rather compelling features personally.

-----

ssmall 777 days ago | link

If I'm not mistaken, ruby and python both offer similar ideas. I've only used both passingly

-----

drivebyacct2 777 days ago | link

Not to be a jerk and I'm no expert in ruby (or much python for that matter), I don't think they do, at all really. At least no go-style interfaces or channels.

-----

gtaylor 777 days ago | link

For what? And how is it working out for you?

-----

drivebyacct2 777 days ago | link

You want to know if it's as good as Hacker News reader say it is, so you ask Hacker News? :P

Yes, it's awesome. :)

-----




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | News News | Bugs and Feature Requests | Y Combinator | Apply | Library | Contact

Search: