The project is licensed under a Business Source License [1] which wouldn't be widely considered open source due to the limitations it's placing on use, so advertising this as open source may be misleading to many. Source available is a more common term for these kinds of license.
If you're interested in why I think this distinction matters, I've written some thoughts about that on my blog [2].
Hi, I'm wells, the creator of NPi. NPi aiming to introducing a 'middle-layer' between LLMs and Agents, serves as a gateway for AI Agents action in virtual world!
NPi is currently under active development, we are eager to involve more AI Agent developers for building NPi together.
Hello! This sounds interesting, but I wasn't immediately understanding it. Does your project enable models like Llama, which don't have native tool use, to have tool use? If so, that would be super useful!
If you're interested in why I think this distinction matters, I've written some thoughts about that on my blog [2].
[1] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/ 991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0ebabca9b506677a/LICENSE
[2] https://danb.me/blog/open-source-available-distinction/