> Harborne got the WSJ to edit its story. But then he filed the suit. This means he is forcing the WSJ to fight him.
There will almost certainly be discovery on all the claims of fact in the story that are disputed in the suit, such as the details of Harborne’s account application. Much of this discovery is likely also to be made public in case filings. Former Signature employees may be called forth as witnesses.
This wil either silence the Tether nay sayers. Or bring to bear more wonky details.
> Harborne got the WSJ to edit its story. But then he filed the suit. This means he is forcing the WSJ to fight him.
There will almost certainly be discovery on all the claims of fact in the story that are disputed in the suit, such as the details of Harborne’s account application. Much of this discovery is likely also to be made public in case filings. Former Signature employees may be called forth as witnesses.
This wil either silence the Tether nay sayers. Or bring to bear more wonky details.