Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

>On the other hand, even if half of that 1 MLOC is still relevant to new ways of building systems (and given that SQL databases are a 70s tech, I doubt it's that much)

SQL is not a technology in the sense of a specific artifact (say, a PDP-11), it's a design based on relational algebra, a formal specification for relational data.

A specific RDBMS implementation might "age", but Math do not age. For as long as we have relational data (data with relations to each other), the relational algebra will be the best, and formally proven correct, way to model it. Period.

The same holds true for every other "tech" that is based on Computed Science. All those technologies are older than the '70 and will be used FOREVER: garbage collection, hash maps, linked lists, regular expressions, b-trees, etc etc, ...

Even specific artifacts remain relevant: TCP/IP, C, UNIX, windowing UIs, etc etc...




The chant that "X is best, period" is a religious notion, not a practical one. You're welcome to worship whatever you please, but for those of us who are here to have a real-world impact, "best" is defined in terms of utility for a particular situation.

Even one of the great RDBMS pioneers, Stonebraker, agrees that RDBMSes are an artifact of a particular era in technology and commerce and should be thrown out and done over:

http://nms.csail.mit.edu/~stavros/pubs/hstore.pdf

-----


>The chant that "X is best, period" is a religious notion, not a practical one.

When it comes to Math, there is no argument. Period.

-----


In the name of the Tangent, and the Sum, and the Multiplier, go thee and spread thy gospel. Amen.

-----


Exactamundo, my friend, but non-ironically of course!

-----




Applications are open for YC Winter 2016

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: