I'm struggling to understand and even read this. The author ought to be using headings instead of so many bullet points, which are meant for a tight group of short related points, not paragraph separators.
But trying to look past that I'm still failing to understand that this is about it what you're meant you be doing.
Maybe you aren't target demographics or something else. I have no problem reading and understanding it.
This is condensed, information rich text that I find way better than 15 pages pages of noncontent.
I dont understand your point about headings - you mean headings-only text is more readable than bullets?
Who is the author? I'm looking for more context on them and their writing and cannot divine anything from the website that would identify them. It's almost as if they're withholding their identity.
> Note 2: do not fix with cognition what can be fixed with chemistry. Before anything else, your brain is a biological machine.
No no no. Stop with the senseless proliferation of pills. If pills were the solution we would not see the huge need for talk therapy - which works only if there is a genuine therapeutic relationship. If you think this further, if you’re in a situation where your therapist is the only non-toxic person in your environment and the only person you can truly connect to, then it’s not your “brain chemistry” but the toxic environment you need to get out of. Don’t take pills to endure shit. Don’t drink coffee to replace sleep.
Talk therapy can not fix depression or ADHD or bipolar or schizophrenia. Pills can mitigate some of the fundamental chemical imbalances present in those brains.
But trying to look past that I'm still failing to understand that this is about it what you're meant you be doing.